If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
At last, back on topic. Mind you it was getting interesting for a while back along. Nevertheless, I was informed by FLs a while ago that basically, soft dampening devices were for soft flying and hard were for hard flying, simple ? Or not ? The thing is, I wonder if you'd get a not too disimilar effect by dialing in more or less expo ? Am I missing something fellas ? Cheers.
Trex 450 SEV2.
Trex 450 SEV2, hack, freeby, but getting expensive. Binned the bu**er !
Trex 550 V2. Adrenalin ( brown kind )
mCPX, better than a Phoenix anyday.
Several planks, gathering dust.
Brains and thumbs work okay, but not at the same time.
Softer dampers allow the feathering shaft to move more in the head block so the head can respond to gusts of wind etc without the heli itself moving so much - hence why the F3Cers like them. But it's a double-edged sword - the extra movement also allows the blade grips to swing further during rapid changes of direction which is why boom strikes etc have been mentioned.
If you're looking to change direction quickly (i.e. 3D) then it's hard dampers you need. If you're looking to stay put, then it's soft ones.
With FBL heads, a soft dampener will momentarily dampen the reaction from a servo input, meaning the FBL unit may over compensate. When the head finally catches up it may move to a more extreme position. At least, thats my logic for it. The proof for me was, sloppy dampeners with FBL made the heli unpleasant to fly, scarey at times. Hard dampeners gave me a grin. Expo wouldn't work in that situation because it only affects your stick inputs, not the FBL inputs.
I must admit, I'm actually quite nervous of maidening my new heli because the dampers are so much softer than I've ever known before. Time will tell I guess.
As someone will point out I don't have flybarless and have no experience of them but, from what I remember of control theory, which isn't much, the rubber things will form part of the overall control loop and a value or range of values will be designed in. It should be possible to setup the controller for a range of hardness values or a figure should be given in the spec for the controller. As flybarless is used for 3D it would probably be pointless to use softer rubber.
This thread has been very useful though. It sounds as though soft would be good for beginners. Especially if it can convert a 450 into a partially self correcting heli. Perhaps even useful for A test use?
just a quick one on fbl dampers
not all fbl units like hard dampers
the sk360 in my sceadu nodded very badly with hard dampers in it, but with the stock dampers ones it works very well
when the sceadu was flown without a fbl unit the hard dampers worked well
my freya fbl with sk360 works well with the std dampers (i've never tried it with hard ones in it)
Hirobo Turbulence D3 a bunch of bls servo's and a 701 gyro Powered by an OS91 hz and a MP2
Winner of the LHC Scale Cup 2011 1/4 scale Vario Bell 47 G3
1/3 scale Vario R22 2012 LHC Scale Cup Judge
member of save the flybar foundation www.alcesterhelicopterclub.bmfa.org sigpic
I must admit, I'm actually quite nervous of maidening my new heli because the dampers are so much softer than I've ever known before. Time will tell I guess.
Been there, done it. Maiden flights (x2) this afternoon.
Comment