Originally posted by trillian
View Post
There is a good article on this by Colin Mill which can be found here; Model Aircraft and Model Flying - W3MH - Home Page
[[[
The speed of response of the flybar to commands can be adjusted as follows:
- Increasing the weight of the paddles slows it down.
- Increasing the area of the paddles speeds it up
- Increasing the rotor RPM speeds it up
- Increasing the aspect ratio (span/chord) of the paddles speeds it up.
- Increasing the length of the flybar speeds it up.
Hence, as we'd expect, increasing the paddle weight slows the flybar response.
The aerodynamic efficiency of the paddles and the weight of the paddles effectively work against each other. But I accept that the paddles have to be heavy enough to 'work the controls'.
The flybar authority comes from the mixing ratios.
There are two important things to remember:
* The flybar should be lagging the roll/pitch of the main rotors - and hence applying a control input against the 'Bell' input;
* There's an implicit control input to the fly-bar due to the flybar disc's tilt with respect to the mainshaft. This tends to make the fly-bar follow the heli - which tends to work against its stabilising effect.
This latter point is (IMO) the problem with flybars. If you make them respond fast, they become less effective as stabilisers, as they respond faster to the disturbance. This can be programmed out of FBL systems (or just not programmed in).

)

and a platinum star






) such a waste of a day but hey we live and learn, anyway sorry I missed it.
Comment