Hi there,
I've noticed that my 130x always seems to 'lean' forward on clockwise yaw rotation and backwards on anticlockwise yawing. So right hand hover circuits drive themselves but left hand ones keep needing to be nudged forwards. Piro hovering also needs constant corrections.
I was assuming that it's a c of g problem but moving the lipo, adding weight to the tail, seem to make no difference. Should I expect this sort of constant correction? I know hovers need input and don't fly themselves but this constant repetitive 'fixing' from a steady level hover seems to be something unnecessary.
Any ideas?
I've noticed that my 130x always seems to 'lean' forward on clockwise yaw rotation and backwards on anticlockwise yawing. So right hand hover circuits drive themselves but left hand ones keep needing to be nudged forwards. Piro hovering also needs constant corrections.
I was assuming that it's a c of g problem but moving the lipo, adding weight to the tail, seem to make no difference. Should I expect this sort of constant correction? I know hovers need input and don't fly themselves but this constant repetitive 'fixing' from a steady level hover seems to be something unnecessary.
Any ideas?
Left, right, he don't care. He sweeps round having masses of fun. Which is why I was mortified I had so much trouble translating that to the 450/500. Thanks again for that lesson by the way. Might get a chance to put it into real life practise when the weather is more ammeanable, sigh.


Comment