I've been learning to fly on this thing for a few months now and I've roughly got the hang of it - with help from a simulator. But there are a few problems with it.
First it's incredibly fragile.
- The skids break every time the landing is heavy. I've got used to aralditing them back together but it's either bad design or bad materials.
- I now seem to have done something to the shaft - the top rotor doesn't contra-rotate properly so that the heli just spins uncontrollably.
- The body is incredibly feeble and badly made.
Surprisingly the blades are undamaged.
Secondly it seems to take a long time to respond to controls and it doesn't really respond very much to any of them with the exception of the rudder, which is very sensitive.
Basically it's pretty useless for what I want. I had an Apache 4ch (bought from Maplin) which was much better quality than the CX3 but it was the wrong mode for me. It cost £75 but I've seen them new on ebay for £30.
Is there any heli out there which is a) tougher b) better made and c) more responsive? I don't mind paying for quality - the CX3 is just not "fit for purpose".
First it's incredibly fragile.
- The skids break every time the landing is heavy. I've got used to aralditing them back together but it's either bad design or bad materials.
- I now seem to have done something to the shaft - the top rotor doesn't contra-rotate properly so that the heli just spins uncontrollably.
- The body is incredibly feeble and badly made.
Surprisingly the blades are undamaged.
Secondly it seems to take a long time to respond to controls and it doesn't really respond very much to any of them with the exception of the rudder, which is very sensitive.
Basically it's pretty useless for what I want. I had an Apache 4ch (bought from Maplin) which was much better quality than the CX3 but it was the wrong mode for me. It cost £75 but I've seen them new on ebay for £30.
Is there any heli out there which is a) tougher b) better made and c) more responsive? I don't mind paying for quality - the CX3 is just not "fit for purpose".


Comment