If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I don't see why it would be any different than any number of helis that have been running with 35mhz systems for years.
Kasama, Minicopter, Henseleit, JR, Shape, Beam
Robbe, RMJ Raptor gasser, powered by
Spartan, Spirit, BeastX, Kontronik, CY Total-G, DX8
member of Epsom Downs and Bloobird clubs
Proud recipient of 7 EGS! and a platinum star
Not heard of many issues with 35mhz PCM in a TREX 700. 35mhz has been used in carbon heli frames for years. However, 2.4 ghz equipment is certainly affordable now and the DX7 is a radio that is more than up to the job, so would question what the point is in flying a heli that you are more than likely chuffed with and have spent some serious cash on when you are considering using equipment (35mhz) that runs a higher risk of causing you issues when there is a viable alternative out there that gives you less risk of any problems.
Said it before and will say it again, peace of mind is so important in this game for me......
I thought that it was possible that carbon could block / shield a 2.4ghz signal.
Generally with 35mhz the aerial runs down, between the skids and up to the tail fin, shielding with carbon fibre frames isn't a problem. If anything 2.4ghz should be affected much more by carbon frames as the aerials are much shorter and more likely to be shaded, that's why Spektrum in particular runs at least two receivers on all full range receivers and Futaba gives long coax shielded aerials with just the end whisker the vital part so they can be positioned better to receive the signal.
Steve H
http://www.himbletonRChelicopters.co.uk
Trex 600N, Trex 700N, now 3G!, Raptor E550 now in fetching Hughes 500E, Trex 250, Trex 500CF, Trex 550E 3G, Beam E4, Outrage 550, Logo 500 3D.
Comment