I think what gets said here gets taken far to far out of context. When we fly models and try out other peoples stuff you have differences in setup to take into account, different tx, different servos, all kinds of stuff comes into play. So when you make a call on what had more collective or less cyclic or flew straighter or wonky or whatever it's only based upon what you have flown and how it felt at the time.
What I meant by saying faster servos won't change collective pop is that putting faster servos on a standard K3D wouldn't increase it's collective pop to excel over a 600N. Of course it would improve the K3D over one with slow servos. This is just my opinion from flying both, bear in mind that the 600N usually has a higher headspeed so collective absolutely should have more pop than the slightly slower head of the K3D.
What I will say is this, I don't recommend one model over the other, they are different that is all. One doesn't massively outfly the other and anyone who tells you otherwise is really not being very honest. It's down to personal preference, both machines are capable of delivering very competent 3D performance, well beyond what most are capable of teaching their thumbs to do. Pick the one you like the look of and have fun. If either machine was a steaming pile of crap we wouldn't be here picking over cyclic and collective responses, take the Century Hawk as an example, anyone wanna point me to a thread where that machine is being compared at a picky detail level?
What I meant by saying faster servos won't change collective pop is that putting faster servos on a standard K3D wouldn't increase it's collective pop to excel over a 600N. Of course it would improve the K3D over one with slow servos. This is just my opinion from flying both, bear in mind that the 600N usually has a higher headspeed so collective absolutely should have more pop than the slightly slower head of the K3D.
What I will say is this, I don't recommend one model over the other, they are different that is all. One doesn't massively outfly the other and anyone who tells you otherwise is really not being very honest. It's down to personal preference, both machines are capable of delivering very competent 3D performance, well beyond what most are capable of teaching their thumbs to do. Pick the one you like the look of and have fun. If either machine was a steaming pile of crap we wouldn't be here picking over cyclic and collective responses, take the Century Hawk as an example, anyone wanna point me to a thread where that machine is being compared at a picky detail level?


had both..so much so i got an electic one on the build


)
Comment