Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The state of electric setups today.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by dani_r View Post

    I personally don't like Life packs as I like to keep a close eye on the capacity of all my power packs. Life doesn't allow you to do that very easily, it relies on you knowing the mah usage so far etc which doesn't compute for me. If you forget, or something goes wrong, you have a problem. But again, each to their own.
    Yeah, this is the main shortcoming of LiFe. I am running them on one heli right now and I have such a large capacity pack that it's never anywhere near being drawn down, but I'm not saving any weight this way.

    I have never had a regulator fail and I have used a lot of them, Duralite, Fromeco, Gryphon, SG Reactor, Flighttech. Conversely (before I switched to all Regs with LiPos) I had a NiMh pack fail causing a crash, so while simple is sometimes better it isn't always.
    Kasama, Minicopter, Henseleit, JR, Shape, Beam
    Robbe, RMJ Raptor gasser, powered by
    Spartan, Spirit, BeastX, Kontronik, CY Total-G, DX8

    member of Epsom Downs and Bloobird clubs
    Proud recipient of 7 EGS! and a platinum star

    Comment


    • #17
      here's a model that had a nimh pack fail
      and a lipo fail in the hover
      with luck it had enough to trigger the fail safe and the model just gentle landed without damage
      apart from my underwear
      it now runs on an opti lipo with a regulator

      d3b.jpgD3a.jpgturbulence.jpgImage0026a.jpg
      Hirobo Turbulence D3
      a bunch of bls servo's and a 701 gyro
      Powered by an OS91 hz and a MP2
      Winner of the LHC Scale Cup 2011

      1/4 scale Vario Bell 47 G3
      1/3 scale Vario R22
      2012 LHC Scale Cup Judge
      member of save the flybar foundation
      www.alcesterhelicopterclub.bmfa.org
      sigpic

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by jimmyhorns View Post
        It wouldnt be straightforward to super-impose (multiplex) signal onto the +ve wire, as the electronics behind the multiplexing would need to be capable of high current draw, adding to weight, size and expense....

        There isnt really any magic to the positive power feed or bus, its essentially just a load of connectors all joined together, by having a signal superimposed it would make this impossible.
        I bow to greater wisdom..but if you can network over the ring main then strikes me a digital signal should go down a heli wire.... Another solution might be to have a receiver in each servo and the fbl unit transmits

        As to concerns re a wire rubbing on the frame...can be just as devastating if that happens now.
        PGK
        450Pro Clone fb, Trex500 fbl beastx, Trex 600N fbl beastx, Trex700N fbl msh brain, Spectra G Hanson 26 3dmax fb, Blitz Avro fb...Futaba 8FG

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by pgkevet View Post
          Another solution might be to have a receiver in each servo and the fbl unit transmits
          Still need to get power to the servos though so still need a pair of wires
          Nice idea though

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by SGD View Post
            Still need to get power to the servos though so still need a pair of wires
            Nice idea though
            ..once again the idea was single wire and -ve airframe. Of course with newer power-packed sulphur based batts on the horizon we could speculate about each servo having it's own power source too: just a cats cradle to recharge..
            PGK
            450Pro Clone fb, Trex500 fbl beastx, Trex 600N fbl beastx, Trex700N fbl msh brain, Spectra G Hanson 26 3dmax fb, Blitz Avro fb...Futaba 8FG

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by pgkevet View Post
              I bow to greater wisdom..but if you can network over the ring main then strikes me a digital signal should go down a heli wire.... Another solution might be to have a receiver in each servo and the fbl unit transmits

              As to concerns re a wire rubbing on the frame...can be just as devastating if that happens now.
              Sure, but how expensive do you want your servos to be?...

              Each signal would need to be encoded with a specific code so the servo knew that it was supposed to react to it, and then each FBL unit or receiver would need to know the ID to send out to each servo.

              Even if you ignore the cost, what is that going to do to latency?... I cant imagine its going to improve it
              Logo 600 3D --- Vortex Vx1n
              JR Forza 700 --- Vortex Vx1e

              Team Macgregor flight team and Magregor industries field rep

              Co-founder of South Hants Helis - and now on Facebook
              And the proud wearer of one

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by jimmyhorns View Post
                Each signal would need to be encoded with a specific code so the servo knew that it was supposed to react to it, and then each FBL unit or receiver would need to know the ID to send out to each servo.
                Don't Futaba already do something along those line with their S-Bus system and servos? Hard wired of course, before I get shot down!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by SGD View Post
                  Don't Futaba already do something along those line with their S-Bus system and servos? Hard wired of course, before I get shot down!
                  They do indeed, but the power and signal is carried on a separate line.

                  and have you seen the prices
                  Logo 600 3D --- Vortex Vx1n
                  JR Forza 700 --- Vortex Vx1e

                  Team Macgregor flight team and Magregor industries field rep

                  Co-founder of South Hants Helis - and now on Facebook
                  And the proud wearer of one

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by jimmyhorns View Post
                    Sure, but how expensive do you want your servos to be?...

                    Each signal would need to be encoded with a specific code so the servo knew that it was supposed to react to it, and then each FBL unit or receiver would need to know the ID to send out to each servo.

                    Even if you ignore the cost, what is that going to do to latency?... I cant imagine its going to improve it
                    All new innovations get charged at silly prices until the likes of hobbyking turn them towards honesty :-) As has been pointed out sbus does something similar in coding. As to latency.. well not many of us can out-fly servo latency... The only one of my sugestions not to hit mainstream would be the -ve airframe... difficult to apply to most planks where the larger market is..
                    PGK
                    450Pro Clone fb, Trex500 fbl beastx, Trex 600N fbl beastx, Trex700N fbl msh brain, Spectra G Hanson 26 3dmax fb, Blitz Avro fb...Futaba 8FG

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by pgkevet View Post
                      All new innovations get charged at silly prices until the likes of hobbyking turn them towards honesty :-) As has been pointed out sbus does something similar in coding. As to latency.. well not many of us can out-fly servo latency... The only one of my sugestions not to hit mainstream would be the -ve airframe... difficult to apply to most planks where the larger market is..
                      Its not the pilots ability to outfly the servo, it would be the flybarless units, which probably are getting reasonably close to that.... the Sbus system is as far as I am aware mostly being marketed at the large scale fixed wing flyers, where the latency is not going to be so much of an issue...

                      As for a -ve airframe, im not sure carbon fibre conducts to the level required (I think it has a pretty high resistance), and the plastic fantastic flyers would also have a hard time....
                      Logo 600 3D --- Vortex Vx1n
                      JR Forza 700 --- Vortex Vx1e

                      Team Macgregor flight team and Magregor industries field rep

                      Co-founder of South Hants Helis - and now on Facebook
                      And the proud wearer of one

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by jimmyhorns View Post
                        Its not the pilots ability to outfly the servo, it would be the flybarless units, which probably are getting reasonably close to that.... the Sbus system is as far as I am aware mostly being marketed at the large scale fixed wing flyers, where the latency is not going to be so much of an issue...

                        As for a -ve airframe, im not sure carbon fibre conducts to the level required (I think it has a pretty high resistance), and the plastic fantastic flyers would also have a hard time....
                        Fair comment re fbl unit speed. The airframe conducivity could caually be sorted easily enough with flat self-adhesive conducting tape or even cover he frame inside in a sheet..would still make wiring way tidier.

                        the thread was about innovation.

                        The coolest thing of late is those servos with sockets so one can make up correct length leads without joins easier and swap/service them without tracing wiring around the shop..
                        PGK
                        450Pro Clone fb, Trex500 fbl beastx, Trex 600N fbl beastx, Trex700N fbl msh brain, Spectra G Hanson 26 3dmax fb, Blitz Avro fb...Futaba 8FG

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X